On 17/04/17 12:09 PM, gordon chung wrote: > i tried also to implement jump hash[2], which improved distribution and > is in theory, less memory intensive as it does not maintain a hash > table. while better at distribution, it still is not completely uniform > and similarly, the less sacks per worker, the worse the distribution.
hmm... may have spoke incorrectly on this one, it's better but i don't think we can use it to assign sacks to processing workers. i think it's only usable for assigning metrics into sacks. cheers, -- gord __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
