Hi, Sure they must have the same provider. Loadbalancer instance could be created in two ways: - implicitly with pool creation, then provider for the pool becomes provider for the instance. - explicitly, with pool created later on and attached to the instance. In that case provider attribute will be validated against instance's provider.
Thanks, Eugene. On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:29 AM, Itsuro ODA <o...@valinux.co.jp> wrote: > Hi Eugene, Iwamoto > > > You are correct. Provider attribute will remain in the pool due to API > > compatibility reasons. > I agree with you. > > I just wanted to make sure pools in a loadblancer can have > different providers or not. (I think it should be same.) > > Thanks > Itsuto Ofa > > On Mon, 2 Dec 2013 12:48:30 +0400 > Eugene Nikanorov <enikano...@mirantis.com> wrote: > > > Hi Iwamoto, > > > > You are correct. Provider attribute will remain in the pool due to API > > compatibility reasons. > > > > Thanks, > > Eugene. > > > > > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:35 AM, IWAMOTO Toshihiro <iwam...@valinux.co.jp > >wrote: > > > > > At Fri, 29 Nov 2013 07:25:54 +0900, > > > Itsuro ODA wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Eugene, > > > > > > > > Thank you for the response. > > > > > > > > I have a comment. > > > > I think 'provider' attribute should be added to loadbalance resource > > > > and used rather than pool's 'provider' since I think using multiple > > > > driver within a loadbalancer does not make sense. > > > > > > There can be a 'provider' attribute in a loadbalancer resource, but, > > > to maintain API, the 'provider' attribute in pools should remain the > > > same. > > > Is there any other attribute planned for the loadbalancer resource? > > > > > > > What do you think ? > > > > > > > > I'm looking forward to your code up ! > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > Itsuro Oda > > > > > > > > On Thu, 28 Nov 2013 16:58:40 +0400 > > > > Eugene Nikanorov <enikano...@mirantis.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Itsuro, > > > > > > > > > > I've updated the wiki with some examples of cli workflow that > > > illustrate > > > > > proposed API. > > > > > Please see the updated page: > > > > > > > > > https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Neutron/LBaaS/LoadbalancerInstance#API_change > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > Eugene. > > > > > > -- > > > IWAMOTO Toshihiro > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > OpenStack-dev mailing list > > > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > -- > Itsuro ODA <o...@valinux.co.jp> > > > _______________________________________________ > OpenStack-dev mailing list > OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev