On Fri, May 05, 2017 at 11:24:49AM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > [snip] > > Cinder theoretically supports LVM/iSCSI, but if you actually try to use it > for anything stressful it falls over. >
A bit of a tangent, but I would love to hear more about this. We have a lot of folks using LVM successfully, at least as far as I've seen, so if there are issues out there that are viewed as Cinder "ignoring" over adding new features, I would really love to know what they are. And ideally have bug reports to give us something to track and work on. > Some of the database pruning tools don't cover all the tables so the DB gets > bigger over time. > > I'm sure there are historical reasons for all of these, I'm just pointing > out some of the things that were surprising to me. > > Chris __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
