On 5/15/17, 11:20 PM, "Davanum Srinivas" <dava...@gmail.com> wrote:
> At this moment, though Fedora has 3.1.7 [1], Xenial is way too old, So > we will need to pull down tar balls from either [2] or [3]. proposing > backports is a possibility, but then we need some flexibility if we > end up picking up some specific version (say 3.0.17 vs 3.1.7). So a > download location would be good to have so we can request infra to > push versions we can experiment with. Hi Dims, I can’t help but ask - how old is too old? By what measure are we saying something is too old? I think we need to be careful with what we do here and ensure that the Distribution partners we have are on board with the criteria and whether They’re ready to include more recent package versions in their extra Archives (eg: RDO / UCA). As developers we want the most recent things because reasons… but Distributions and Operators are then stuck with raised complexity in their release and quality management processes. ________________________________ Rackspace Limited is a company registered in England & Wales (company registered number 03897010) whose registered office is at 5 Millington Road, Hyde Park Hayes, Middlesex UB3 4AZ. Rackspace Limited privacy policy can be viewed at www.rackspace.co.uk/legal/privacy-policy - This e-mail message may contain confidential or privileged information intended for the recipient. Any dissemination, distribution or copying of the enclosed material is prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail at ab...@rackspace.com and delete the original message. Your cooperation is appreciated. __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
