Michał Jastrzębski wrote: > On 16 May 2017 at 06:20, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: >> I'd prefer for these builds to have a daily cadence because it sets the >> expectations w.r.t maintenance right: "These images are daily builds and not >> certified releases. For stable builds you're better off building it >> yourself" > > And daily builds are exactly what I wanted in the first place:) We > probably will keep publishing release packages too, but we can be so > called 3rd party. I also agree [4] is completely unrealistic and I > would be against putting such heavy burden of responsibility on any > community, including Kolla. > > While daily cadence will send message that it's not stable, truth will > be that it will be more stable than what people would normally build > locally (again, it passes more gates), but I'm totally fine in not > saying that and let people decide how they want to use it. > > So, can we move on with implementation?
I'm just listing options to help frame the discussion. I still think we need a global answer on this (for container images and VMs) so I think it would be great to have a clear TC resolution (picking one of those options) before moving on with implementation. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
