On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:06 PM, Julien Danjou <jul...@danjou.info> wrote:
> On Wed, May 17 2017, aalvarez wrote: > > > I do not need this functionality for production, but for testing. I > think it > > would be nice if we can specify the interface for the gnocchi-api even > for > > test purposes, just like the port. > > Feel free to send a patch. This is provided by pbr so that's where you > should sent the patch: > > https://docs.openstack.org/developer/pbr/ > > Hi jd, Ceilometer, Gnocchi, Aodh all use pbr, so the port is 8000 by default. I guess we also should hardcode Gnocchi's port in rdo project, together with Aodh. i proposed patchs for Aodh and Gnocchi: https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/5848/ https://review.rdoproject.org/r/#/c/5847/ But hguemar suggest not to hardcode port. How do you think about this? Cheers, Hanxi Liu _________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org/?subject:unsubscribe> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
