Thanks Sam On Sat, 20 May 2017, 06:51 Sam P, <sam47pr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Vikash, > Great... I will add you as reviewer to this spec. > Thank you.. > --- Regards, > Sampath > > > > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:06 PM, Vikash Kumar > <vikash.ku...@oneconvergence.com> wrote: > > Hi Greg, > > > > Please include my email in this spec also. We are also dealing with > HA > > of Virtual Instances (especially for Vendors) and will participate. > > > > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 11:33 PM, Waines, Greg < > greg.wai...@windriver.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Yes I am good with writing spec for this in masakari-spec. > >> > >> > >> > >> Do you use gerrit for this git ? > >> > >> Do you have a template for your specs ? > >> > >> > >> > >> Greg. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Sam P <sam47pr...@gmail.com> > >> Reply-To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" > >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > >> Date: Thursday, May 18, 2017 at 1:51 PM > >> To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" > >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] [nova] [HA] [masakari] VM > Heartbeat > >> / Healthcheck Monitoring > >> > >> > >> > >> Hi Greg, > >> > >> Thank you Adam for followup. > >> > >> This is new feature for masakari-monitors and think Masakari can > >> > >> accommodate this feature in masakari-monitors. > >> > >> From the implementation prospective, it is not that hard to do. > >> > >> However, as you can see in our Boston presentation, Masakari will > >> > >> replace its monitoring parts ( which is masakari-monitors) with, > >> > >> nova-host-alerter, **-process-alerter, and **-instance-alerter. (** > >> > >> part is not defined yet..:p)... > >> > >> Therefore, I would like to save this specifications, and make sure we > >> > >> will not miss anything in the transformation.. > >> > >> Does is make sense to write simple spec for this in masakari-spec [1]? > >> > >> So we can discuss about the requirements how to implement it. > >> > >> > >> > >> [1] https://github.com/openstack/masakari-specs > >> > >> > >> > >> --- Regards, > >> > >> Sampath > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Adam Spiers <aspi...@suse.com> wrote: > >> > >> I don't see any reason why masakari couldn't handle that, but you'd > >> > >> have to ask Sampath and the masakari team whether they would consider > >> > >> that in scope for their roadmap. > >> > >> > >> > >> Waines, Greg <greg.wai...@windriver.com> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> Sure. I can propose a new user story. > >> > >> > >> > >> And then are you thinking of including this user story in the scope of > >> > >> what masakari would be looking at ? > >> > >> > >> > >> Greg. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Adam Spiers <aspi...@suse.com> > >> > >> Reply-To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" > >> > >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > >> > >> Date: Wednesday, May 17, 2017 at 10:08 AM > >> > >> To: "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org" > >> > >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org> > >> > >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] [nova] [HA] VM Heartbeat / > >> > >> Healthcheck Monitoring > >> > >> > >> > >> Thanks for the clarification Greg. This sounds like it has the > >> > >> potential to be a very useful capability. May I suggest that you > >> > >> propose a new user story for it, along similar lines to this existing > >> > >> one? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/openstack-user-stories/user-stories/proposed/ha_vm.html > >> > >> > >> > >> Waines, Greg <greg.wai...@windriver.com<mailto: > greg.wai...@windriver.com>> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> Yes that’s correct. > >> > >> VM Heartbeating / Health-check Monitoring would introduce intrusive / > >> > >> white-box type monitoring of VMs / Instances. > >> > >> > >> > >> I realize this is somewhat in the gray-zone of what a cloud should be > >> > >> monitoring or not, > >> > >> but I believe it provides an alternative for Applications deployed in > VMs > >> > >> that do not have an external monitoring/management entity like a VNF > >> Manager > >> > >> in the MANO architecture. > >> > >> And even for VMs with VNF Managers, it provides a highly reliable > >> > >> alternate monitoring path that does not rely on Tenant Networking. > >> > >> > >> > >> You’re correct, that VM HB/HC Monitoring would leverage > >> > >> https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Qemu_guest_agent > >> > >> that would require the agent to be installed in the images for talking > >> > >> back to the compute host. > >> > >> ( there are other examples of similar approaches in openstack ... the > >> > >> murano-agent for installation, the swift-agent for object store > management > >> ) > >> > >> Although here, in the case of VM HB/HC Monitoring, via the QEMU Guest > >> > >> Agent, the messaging path is internal thru a QEMU virtual serial device. > >> > >> i.e. a very simple interface with very few dependencies ... it’s up and > >> > >> available very early in VM lifecycle and virtually always up. > >> > >> > >> > >> Wrt failure modes / use-cases > >> > >> > >> > >> · a VM’s response to a Heartbeat Challenge Request can be as > >> > >> simple as just ACK-ing, > >> > >> this alone allows for detection of: > >> > >> > >> > >> o a failed or hung QEMU/KVM instance, or > >> > >> > >> > >> o a failed or hung VM’s OS, or > >> > >> > >> > >> o a failure of the VM’s OS to schedule the QEMU Guest Agent daemon, > or > >> > >> > >> > >> o a failure of the VM to route basic IO via linux sockets. > >> > >> > >> > >> · I have had feedback that this is similar to the virtual > hardware > >> > >> watchdog of QEMU/KVM ( > >> > >> https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsWatchdog ) > >> > >> > >> > >> · However, the VM Heartbeat / Health-check Monitoring > >> > >> > >> > >> o provides a higher-level (i.e. application-level) heartbeating > >> > >> > >> > >> § i.e. if the Heartbeat requests are being answered by the Application > >> > >> running within the VM > >> > >> > >> > >> o provides more than just heartbeating, as the Application can use it > to > >> > >> trigger a variety of audits, > >> > >> > >> > >> o provides a mechanism for the Application within the VM to report a > >> > >> Health Status / Info back to the Host / Cloud, > >> > >> > >> > >> o provides notification of the Heartbeat / Health-check status to > >> > >> higher-level cloud entities thru Vitrage > >> > >> > >> > >> § e.g. VM-Heartbeat-Monitor - to - Vitrage - (EventAlarm) - Aodh - > ... > >> > >> - VNF-Manager > >> > >> > >> > >> - (StateChange) - Nova - ... - VNF Manager > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> Greg. > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> From: Adam Spiers <aspi...@suse.com<mailto:aspi...@suse.com>> > >> > >> Reply-To: > >> > >> > >> "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto: > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>" > >> > >> > >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto: > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> > >> > >> Date: Tuesday, May 16, 2017 at 7:29 PM > >> > >> To: > >> > >> > >> "openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto: > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>" > >> > >> > >> <openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org<mailto: > openstack-dev@lists.openstack.org>> > >> > >> Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [vitrage] [nova] [HA] VM Heartbeat / > >> > >> Healthcheck Monitoring > >> > >> > >> > >> Waines, Greg > >> > >> > >> <greg.wai...@windriver.com<mailto:greg.wai...@windriver.com><mailto: > greg.wai...@windriver.com><mailto:greg.wai...@windriver.com%3e>> > >> > >> wrote: > >> > >> thanks for the pointers Sam. > >> > >> > >> > >> I took a quick look. > >> > >> I agree that the VM Heartbeat / Health-check looks like a good fit into > >> > >> Masakari. > >> > >> > >> > >> Currently your instance monitoring looks like it is strictly black-box > >> > >> type monitoring thru libvirt events. > >> > >> Is that correct ? > >> > >> i.e. you do not do any intrusive type monitoring of the instance thru > the > >> > >> QUEMU Guest Agent facility > >> > >> correct ? > >> > >> > >> > >> That is correct: > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > https://github.com/openstack/masakari-monitors/blob/master/masakarimonitors/instancemonitor/instance.py > >> > >> > >> > >> I think this is what VM Heartbeat / Health-check would add to Masaraki. > >> > >> Let me know if you agree. > >> > >> > >> > >> OK, so you are looking for something slightly different I guess, based > >> > >> on this QEMU guest agent? > >> > >> > >> > >> https://wiki.libvirt.org/page/Qemu_guest_agent > >> > >> > >> > >> That would require the agent to be installed in the images, which is > >> > >> extra work but I imagine quite easily justifiable in some scenarios. > >> > >> What failure modes do you have in mind for covering with this > >> > >> approach - things like the guest kernel freezing, for instance? > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > __________________________________________________________________________ > >> > >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >> > >> Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > >> > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > >> > >> > >> > __________________________________________________________________________ > >> > >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >> > >> Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > >> > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > __________________________________________________________________________ > >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > >> Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards, > > Vikash > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: > openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev