On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 09:22:07AM -0400, Sean Dague wrote: > This is a thread for anyone that participated in the onboarding rooms, > on either the presenter or audience side. Because we all went into this > creating things from whole cloth, I'm sure there are lots of lessons > learned. > > If you ran a room, please post the project, what you did in the room, > what you think worked, what you would have done differently. If you > attended a room you didn't run, please provide feedback about which one > it was, and what you thought worked / didn't work from the other side of > the table.
TripleO: Attendees - nearly full room (~30 people?) We took an informal approach to our session, we polled the room asking for questions, and on request gave an architectural overview and some code/template walkthroughs, then had open questions/discussion for the remainder of the session. Overall it worked quite well, but next time I would like visibility of some specific questions/topics ahead of time to enable better preparation of demo/slide content, and also we should have prepared a demo environment prior to the session to enable easier hands-on examples/demos. Overall I thought the new track was a good idea, and the feedback I got from those attending was positive. The slides we used are linked from this blog post: http://hardysteven.blogspot.co.uk/2017/05/openstack-summit-tripleo-project.html Steve __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
