On 5/23/2017 9:56 AM, Duncan Thomas wrote:
On 23 May 2017 4:51 am, "Matt Riedemann" <mriede...@gmail.com
<mailto:mriede...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Is this really something we are going to have to deny at least
once per release? My God how is it that this is the #1 thing
everyone for all time has always wanted Nova to do for them?
Is it entirely unreasonable to turn the question around and ask why,
given it is such a commonly requested feature, the Nova team are so
resistant to it?
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
I am going to jump into the fray here ...
I think that at some point we need to do a cost/benefit analysis. If
customers really want this, than maybe it is worth the potential
technical debt. Going down a route of hacking something together from
the client seems to potentially incur more technical debt and create a
worse UX.
At the risks of having things thrown at me, I am going to say that this
could have a number of benefits. It could be leveraged by the Cinder
Ephemeral driver that is being considered. Volume types associated with
compute hosts could be used to ensure use of storage local to the
compute host that is managed by Cinder.
Anyway, that is my $0.02.
Jay
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
