Thanks all. On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Dan Smith <d...@danplanet.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for answering the base question. So, if AZs are implemented with > > haggs, then really, they are truly disjoint from cells (ie, not a subset > > of a cell and not a superset of a cell, just unrelated.) Does that > > philosophy agree with what you are stating? > > Correct, aggregates are at the top level, and they can span cells if you > so desire (or not if you don't configure any that do). The aggregate > stuff doesn't know anything about cells, it only knows about hosts, so > it's really independent. > > --Dan > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
