On 30 May 2017 at 15:26, Hongbin Lu <hongbin...@huawei.com> wrote: > Please consider leveraging Fuxi instead. >
Is there a missing functionality from rexray? > Kuryr/Fuxi team is working very hard to deliver the docker network/storage > plugins. I wish you will work with us to get them integrated with > Magnum-provisioned cluster. > Patches are welcome to support fuxi as an *option* instead of rexray, so users can choose. > Currently, COE clusters provisioned by Magnum is far away from > enterprise-ready. I think the Magnum project will be better off if it can > adopt Kuryr/Fuxi which will give you a better OpenStack integration. > > > > Best regards, > > Hongbin > fuxi feature request: Add authentication using a trustee and a trustID. Cheers, Spyros > > > *From:* Spyros Trigazis [mailto:strig...@gmail.com] > *Sent:* May-30-17 7:47 AM > *To:* OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > *Subject:* Re: [openstack-dev] [fuxi][kuryr] Where to commit codes for > Fuxi-golang > > > > FYI, there is already a cinder volume driver for docker available, written > > in golang, from rexray [1]. > > > Our team recently contributed to libstorage [3], it could support manila > too. Rexray > also supports the popular cloud providers. > > Magnum's docker swarm cluster driver, already leverages rexray for cinder > integration. [2] > > Cheers, > Spyros > > > > [1] https://github.com/codedellemc/rexray/releases/tag/v0.9.0 > > [2] https://github.com/codedellemc/libstorage/releases/tag/v0.6.0 > > [3] http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/magnum/tree/magn > um/drivers/common/templates/swarm/fragments/volume- > service.sh?h=stable/ocata > > > > On 27 May 2017 at 12:15, zengchen <chenzeng...@163.com> wrote: > > Hi John & Ben: > > I have committed a patch[1] to add a new repository to Openstack. Please > take a look at it. Thanks very much! > > > > [1]: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/468635 > > > > Best Wishes! > > zengchen > > > > > > 在 2017-05-26 21:30:48，"John Griffith" <john.griffi...@gmail.com> 写道： > > > > > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 10:01 PM, zengchen <chenzeng...@163.com> wrote: > > > > Hi john: > > I have seen your updates on the bp. I agree with your plan on how to > develop the codes. > > However, there is one issue I have to remind you that at present, Fuxi > not only can convert > > Cinder volume to Docker, but also Manila file. So, do you consider to > involve Manila part of codes > > in the new Fuxi-golang? > > Agreed, that's a really good and important point. Yes, I believe Ben > Swartzlander > > > > is interested, we can check with him and make sure but I certainly hope > that Manila would be interested. > > Besides, IMO, It is better to create a repository for Fuxi-golang, because > > Fuxi is the project of Openstack, > > Yeah, that seems fine; I just didn't know if there needed to be any more > conversation with other folks on any of this before charing ahead on new > repos etc. Doesn't matter much to me though. > > > > > > Thanks very much! > > > > Best Wishes! > > zengchen > > > > > At 2017-05-25 22:47:29, "John Griffith" <john.griffi...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, May 25, 2017 at 5:50 AM, zengchen <chenzeng...@163.com> wrote: > > Very sorry to foget attaching the link for bp of rewriting Fuxi with go > language. > https://blueprints.launchpad.net/fuxi/+spec/convert-to-golang > > > > At 2017-05-25 19:46:54, "zengchen" <chenzeng...@163.com> wrote: > > Hi guys: > > hongbin had committed a bp of rewriting Fuxi with go language[1]. My > question is where to commit codes for it. > > We have two choice, 1. create a new repository, 2. create a new branch. > IMO, the first one is much better. Because > > there are many differences in the layer of infrastructure, such as CI. > What's your opinion? Thanks very much > > > > Best Wishes > > zengchen > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > Hi Zengchen, > > > > For now I was thinking just use Github and PR's outside of the OpenStack > projects to bootstrap things and see how far we can get. I'll update the > BP this morning with what I believe to be the key tasks to work through. > > > > Thanks, > > John > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
