On Wed, May 31, 2017 at 03:22:59PM +0000, Jeremy Stanley wrote: > On 2017-05-31 09:43:11 -0400 (-0400), Doug Hellmann wrote: > [...] > > it's news to me that they're considering reversing course. If the > > QA team isn't going to continue, we'll need to figure out what > > that means and potentially find another group to do it. > > I wasn't there for the discussion, but it sounds likely to be a > mischaracterization. > I'm going to assume it's not true (or much more > nuanced) at least until someone responds on behalf of the QA team. > This particular subthread is only going to go further into the weeds > until it is grounded in some authoritative details.
+1 I'm very confused by this whole thread TBH. Was there a defcore test which was blocked from tempest? Quite frankly the amount of contribution to tempest specifically for defcore tests is very minimal. (at most 1 or 2 patches per cycle) It seems like this whole concern is based on a misunderstanding somewhere and just is going off in a weird direction. -Matt Treinish
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
