On 2017-06-15 10:48:21 +0200 (+0200), Thierry Carrez wrote: [...] > I think that, despite the efforts of the Fuel team, Fuel did not become > what we hoped when we made it official: a universal installer that would > be used across the board. It was worth a try, I'm happy that we tried, > but I think it's time to stop considering it a part of "OpenStack" > proper and make it a hosted project. It can of course continue its > existence as an unofficial project hosted on OpenStack infrastructure. > > Thoughts ?
I agree, it makes sense to be more clear as to the lack of community-wide support for that effort. Perhaps if its popularity increases outside one vendor's customer base to the point where contributions from a broader set of stakeholders emerge, we can once again evaluate its governance state. -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
