On Thu, Jun 15, 2017, 10:45 AM Tim Bell <[email protected]> wrote: > OpenStack Nucleus and OpenStack Electrons? > > Tim > > -----Original Message----- > From: Thierry Carrez <[email protected]> > Organization: OpenStack > Reply-To: "OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)" < > [email protected]> > Date: Thursday, 15 June 2017 at 14:57 > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected] > > > Subject: Re: [openstack-dev] [all][tc] Moving away from "big tent" > terminology > > Sean Dague wrote: > > [...] > > I think those are all fine. The other term that popped into my head > was > > "Friends of OpenStack" as a way to describe the openstack-hosted > efforts > > that aren't official projects. It may be too informal, but I do think > > the OpenStack-Hosted vs. OpenStack might still mix up in people's > head. > > My original thinking was to call them "hosted projects" or "host > projects", but then it felt a bit incomplete. I kinda like the "Friends > of OpenStack" name, although it seems to imply some kind of vetting > that > we don't actually do. > > An alternative would be to give "the OpenStack project infrastructure" > some kind of a brand name (say, "Opium", for OpenStack project > infrastructure ultimate madness) and then call the hosted projects > "Opium projects". Rename the Infra team to Opium team, and voilà! > > -- > Thierry Carrez (ttx) > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: > [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
I think moving away from "big tent" is fine though the terminology did work for some people. I am responding under Tim's note because I think it gets at what we really want to communicate and takes me to what we have presented in OUI. We have Core OpenStack Projects and then a whole community of additional projects that support cloud functionality. So, without it being named, or cutesy, though I liked "Friends of Openstack", can we go with "OpenStack Core Projects" and "Peripheral OpenStack Projects"? Hope that idea helps. Jay > >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
