On Jun 20, 2017, at 8:38 AM, Jay Pipes <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> The example I posted used 3 resource providers. 2 compute nodes with no >>> local disk and a shared storage pool. >> Now I’m even more confused. In the straw man example >> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471927/ >> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471927/>) >> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471927/3/specs/pike/approved/placement-allocation-requests.rst >> >> <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/471927/3/specs/pike/approved/placement-allocation-requests.rst>> >> I see only one variable ($COMPUTE_NODE_UUID) referencing a compute node in >> the response. > > I'm referring to the example I put in this email threads in > paste.openstack.org <http://paste.openstack.org/> with numbers showing 1600 > bytes for 3 resource providers: > > http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-June/118593.html > <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-June/118593.html>
And I’m referring to the comment I made on the spec back on June 13 that was never corrected/clarified. I’m glad you gave an example yesterday after I expressed my confusion; that was the whole purpose of starting this thread. Things may be clear to you, but they have confused me and others. We can’t help if we don’t understand. -- Ed Leafe
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
