On 07/07/2017 07:38 PM, Giulio Fidente wrote: > On 07/04/2017 08:00 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> On Wed, Jun 28, 2017 at 9:37 PM, Giulio Fidente <gfide...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On 06/28/2017 04:35 PM, Emilien Macchi wrote: >>>> Hey folks, >>>> >>>> Let's start to prepare the next PTG in Denver. >>>> >>>> Here's the schedule draft: >>>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xmOdT6uZ5XqViActr5sBOaz_mEgjKSCY7NEWcAEcT-A/pubhtml?gid=397241312&single=true&usp=gmail >>>> We'll have a room Wednesday, Thursday and Friday. We'll probably >>>> finish by end of Friday morning. >>>> >>>> Etherpad for the PTG: >>>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ptg-queens >>> >>> thanks Emilien! >>> >>> I've added a session into the agenda about the integration of >>> ceph-ansible as this brough in a generic functionality in Heat and >>> TripleO which allows services to describe workflows to be executed >>> during the overcloud deployment steps >>> >>> I think it'd be nice to review together what the submissions tracked by >>> the two blueprints actually do [1] [2] and how! >> >> Really cool. Indeed, a session for this topic would be awesome. Please >> make sure we prepare the agenda (maybe prepare a TL;DR on the ML to >> summarize what has been done and what remains). >> So we prepare the session correctly and can directly start with >> pro-active discussions. > Thanks! I've just added a link to the session etherpad: > > https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-ptg-queens-heat-mistral-ceph-ansible > > I think it'll be interesting to discuss it at the PTG because it > provides for a pretty generic mechanism to: > > 1) run unmodified playbooks, per service > 2) pass native params to the playbooks without wrappers > 3) build the full inventory to keep the decision on where to run the > tasks in the playbook > 4) keep in heat the mechanism to emit per-role settings and also > orchestrate the deployment steps > > But some of it can probably be generalized further and extended or > changed for a potential even more tight integration with ansible (thanks > Steven and James for the feedback)... bringing us slowly to the other > topic which James added to the agenda!
I thought it might have been useful to put up a short walkthrough of the more interesting changes we implemented to have this functionality and wrote a blog post [1] I would encourage everyone interested in mistral>ansible and/or Ceph in taking a look to the submissions referenced by the blog post ... and help reviewing the latest still on review Thanks for the interest in the topic! 1. http://giuliofidente.com/2017/07/understanding-ceph-ansible-in-tripleo.html -- Giulio Fidente GPG KEY: 08D733BA __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
