On 2017-06-18 11:06, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > On 2017-06-13 15:01, Paul Belanger wrote: >> Greetings, >> >> I'd like to propose we stop using track-upstream for project-config on >> deb-packaging projects. It seems there is no active development on these >> projects currently and by using track-upstream we currently wasting both CI >> resources and HDD space keeping their projects in sync with there upstream >> openstack projects. >> >> Long term, we don't actually want to support the behavior. I propose we stop >> doing this today, and if somebody steps up to continue the effort on >> packaging >> our release we then progress forward with out the need of track-upstream. >> >> Effectively, track-upstream duplicates the size of a projects git repo. For >> example, if deb-nova is setup to track-upstream of nova, we copy all commits >> and >> import them into deb-nova. This puts unneeded pressure on our infrastructure >> moving forward, the git overlay option for gbp is likely the solution we >> could >> use. > > Indeed ;( > > Do you have a patch ready or was there some alternative proposal?
to close the loop: Patch is up now: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485362/ Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@{suse.com,opensuse.org} Twitter: jaegerandi SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton, HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg) GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F FED1 389A 563C C272 A126 __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
