On 2017-07-28 15:32:01 -0400 (-0400), David Desrosiers wrote: [...] > I am very opposed to removing subsets of docs, including the install guide, > after the release goes eol upstream from consumers for exactly that reason. > > Watermarking the upstream docs with series and version should reduce or > eliminate the need for people to incorrectly submit fixes, patches and PRs > for eol releases that the core team can no longer support, but that > shouldn't necessitate removal of the installation instructions.
Perhaps a compromise is to add very visible banners that explicitly remind the reader they're looking at installation instructions for an outdated version of the software, with a link to see the current installation instructions instead? Simply relying on newcomers to recognize release series names and inherently know whether they're reading the latest version is an issue. -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
