On 17-07-31 21:09:52, Matt Riedemann wrote: > On 7/31/2017 5:21 PM, Tony Breeds wrote: > > We need a +1 from the release team (are they okay to accept a late > > release of glance_store); and a +1 from glance (are they okay to do said > > release) > > Glance doesn't actually need this minimum version bump for os-brick, the > fix is for some attached volume extend stuff, which isn't related to > Glance, so does having the minimum bump in glance* matter? > > -- > > Thanks, > > Matt > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
For co-installability between projects it'd be good to be in sync. The same could be said to many of the bumps that go through the requirements project. One of the things we've been working on is divergent requirements, where the goal is to keep making sure all projects test against one set of upper-constraints, but allow each project to manage their requirements outside of that. -- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
