On 19 July 2017 at 17:02, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 17 July 2017 at 15:56, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: >> On 17 July 2017 at 15:37, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 1:55 AM, Derek Higgins <der...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>> On 12 July 2017 at 22:33, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: >>>>>> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:23 PM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> [...] >>>>>>> Derek, it seems like you want to deploy Ironic on scenario006 >>>>>>> (https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802). I was wondering how it >>>>>>> would work with multinode jobs. >>>>>> >>>>>> Derek, I also would like to point out that >>>>>> https://review.openstack.org/#/c/474802 is missing the environment >>>>>> file for non-containerized deployments & and also the pingtest file. >>>>>> Just for the record, if we can have it before the job moves in gate. >>>>> >>>>> I knew I had left out the ping test file, this is the next step but I >>>>> can create a noop one for now if you'd like? >>>> >>>> Please create a basic pingtest with common things we have in other >>>> scenarios. >>>> >>>>> Is the non-containerized deployments a requirement? >>>> >>>> Until we stop supporting non-containerized deployments, I would say yes. >>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Emilien Macchi >>>> >>>> So if you create a libvirt domain, would it be possible to do it on >>>> scenario004 for example and keep coverage for other services that are >>>> already on scenario004? It would avoid to consume a scenario just for >>>> Ironic. If not possible, then talk with Flavio and one of you will >>>> have to prepare scenario007 or 0008, depending where Numans is in his >>>> progress to have OVN coverage as well. >>> >>> I haven't seen much resolution / answers about it. We still have the >>> conflict right now and open questions. >>> >>> Derek, Flavio - let's solve this one this week if we can. >> Yes, I'll be looking into using scenario004 this week. I was traveling >> last week so wasn't looking at it. > > I'm not sure if this is what you had intended but I believe to do > this(i.e. test the nova ironic driver) we we'll > need to swap out the nova libvirt driver for the ironic one. I think > this is ok as the libvirt driver has coverage > in other scenarios. > > Because there are no virtual BMC's setup yet on the controller I also > have to remove the instance creation, > but if merged I'll next work on adding these now. So I'm think > something like this > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/485261/
Quick update here, after talking to Emilien about this, I'll add to this patch to set up VirtualBMC instances and not remove instance creation. So it continues to test a ceph backed glance. > >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> -- >>> Emilien Macchi __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev