On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Justin Kilpatrick <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe I'm getting a little off topic with this question, but why was > Tempest removed last time? > > I'm not well versed in the history of this discussion, but from what I > understand Tempest in the gate has > been an off and on again thing for a while but I've never heard the > story of why it got removed.
I think the main reason has always been CI job runtime - we have a hard limit for job timeouts, and historically we've had better luck using our tripleo "pingtest" minimal functional test vs running a suite of tempest tests as it was just much faster than running tempest smoke tests - that may no longer be the case though, I've not used tempest myself for a while. Steve __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
