> For me, a tutorial is something that teaches. So after I've gone through a > tutorial I would expect to have learned how installs work and would just know > these things (with an occasional need to reference a few points) going forward. > > A guide to me is something that I know I will use whenever I need to do > something. So for me, having an installation guide is what I would expect > from this as every time I need to do a package based install, I am going to pull > up the guide to go through it. > Interesting. So Sean has the opposite impression from Eric and I. Yeah, that does make it seem like reaching a consensus will be difficult. At that point I think consistency becomes the most important thing.
I completely agree consistency is more important, than bike shedding over the name :) To be honest, it would be easier to change everything to ‘guide’ – seeing as all our URLs are ‘install-guide’. But that’s the lazy in me speaking. Industry wise – there does seem to be more of a trend towards ‘guide’ rather than ‘tutorial’. Although, that is at a cursory glance. I am happy to investigate further, if this matter is of some contention to people? __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev