On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 10:17 PM, Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> wrote: > With that in mind I'd suggest that your review isn't appropriate for
If we have to give up backports that help customers to get production-ready environments, I would consider giving up stable policy tag which probably doesn't fit for projects like installers. In a real world, users don't deploy master or Pike (even not Ocata) but are still on Liberty, and most of the time Newton. What proposing Giulio probably comes from the real world, the field, who actually manage OpenStack at scale and on real environments (not in devstack from master). If we can't have this code in-tree, we'll probably carry this patch downstream (which is IMHO bad because of maintenance and lack of CI). In that case, I'll vote to give up stable:follows-policy so we can do what we need. -- Emilien Macchi __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
