On 2017-10-04 13:51:37 +0100 (+0100), Stephen Finucane wrote: [...] > Not to hijack the thread but, we're moving projects to storyboard? > The only thing I can find about this is that the Watcher project > considering switching [1]. Is there a spec or something I can look > at about this?
There is the long-standing Infra spec at http://specs.openstack.org/openstack-infra/infra-specs/specs/task-tracker.html which is currently at phase 1 task 4. It was considered for a possible community goal over the Queens cycle, but in the goals session in Boston it was suggested to check back in Sydney and see whether SB has reached sufficient critical mass. The idea at this point is to at least make sure new projects know it's an available option for them rather than directing them all straight to LP. It's also becoming readily apparent that the earlier decision to hold back migration for interested teams over concerns of shared bug divergence is hurting adoption; therefore we may want to consider allowing any team to migrate to SB independent of other closely related projects who may not currently (or perhaps ever) wish to do the same. However the expectation is that the Infra team will not want to support integration with two task/defect trackers indefinitely, and so at some point LP tie-ins to things like code review and stats tracking are increasingly likely to simply be removed rather than fixed if^H^Hwhen they break. -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev