Sean Dague wrote: > [...] > I still think it's hard to describe to folks what is going on without > pictures. And the tag structure might just be the wrong way to describe > the world, because they are a set of positive assertions, and upgrade > expectations are really about: "how terrible will this be". > > If I was an operator the questions I might have is: > [...] > > The tags were really built around grouping a few of these, but even with > folks that are near the problem, they got confusing quick. I really > think that some more pictoral upgrade safety cards or something > explaining the things you need to consider, and what parts projects > handle for you would be really useful. And then revisit whatever the > tagging structure is going to be later.
Good point. Maybe the upgrade functionality is critical enough to warrant its own data set, and using a set of binary tags is not the best way to capture it. -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
