> On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:02 PM, Chris Friesen > <chris.frie...@windriver.com> wrote: >> On 10/06/2017 11:32 AM, Mathieu Gagné wrote: >>> >>> Why not supporting this use case? >> >> >> I don't think anyone is suggesting we support do it, but nobody has stepped >> up to actually merge a change that implements it. >> >> I think what Matt is suggesting is that we make it fail fast *now*, and if >> someone else implements it then they can remove the fast failure at the same >> time. >>
On Fri, Oct 6, 2017 at 2:10 PM, Mathieu Gagné <mga...@calavera.ca> wrote: > I don't think there ever was a technical limitation to add support for it. > > I have nothing to back my claims but IIRC, it was more philosophical > points against adding support for it. So it looks like people worked on this feature in the past: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/305079/ And there was pending technical questions. =) Would it be worth the effort to bring that one back, maybe with a spec so people can address technical details in there? -- Mathieu __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
