On Mon, Oct 9, 2017 at 2:29 AM, Flavio Percoco <fla...@redhat.com> wrote: [...] > 1. A repo per role: Each role would have its own repo - this is the way I've > been developing it on Github. This model is closer to the ansible way of > doing > things and it'll make it easier to bundle, ship, and collaborate on, > individual > roles. Going this way would produce something similar to what the > openstack-ansible folks have.
+1 on #1 for the composability. [...] Have we considered renaming it to something without tripleo in the name? Or is it too specific to TripleO that we want it in the name? -- Emilien Macchi __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
