Hi. Your questions about setting up nodepool are a bit off topic for this email thread, but I'll try to answer them for you below:
On Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 1:31 AM, Rikimaru Honjo < honjo.rikim...@po.ntt-tx.co.jp> wrote: > Hello, > > I'm trying to install & configure nodepool for Zuul v3 in my CI > environment now. > I use feature/zuulv3 branch.(ver. 0.4.1.dev430) > > I referred nodepool documents and infra/project-config tree. > And I have some questions about this version of nodepool. > > 1)Is there the information about differences of configuration between > nodepool for zuul v2 and v3? > Or, can I configure feature/zuulv3 basically same as lower version? > We don't document the differences between versions, but all of the v3 config options are documented in the nodepool docs (you can generate them from the source repo with the command: tox -e docs). For example configs, you can look at tools/fake.yaml, or in devstack/plugin.sh which writes a nodepool.yaml used in our testing environment. Or look at the configs we use in infra (see link below). > 2)Below suggestion is wrote in README.rst. > But such file is not contained in the infra/system-config tree now. > Where is the file? > > Create or adapt a nodepool yaml file. You can adapt an infra/system-config >> one, or fake.yaml as desired. Note that fake.yaml's settings won't Just >> Work - consult ./modules/openstack_project/te >> mplates/nodepool/nodepool.yaml.erb in the infra/system-config tree to >> see a production config. >> > > We need to update the README (thanks for pointing this out). The infra nodepool configs are in project-config now. Example: https://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack-infra/project-config/tree/nodepool/nl01.openstack.org.yaml > 3)Can I use "images" key in "providers"? > I used "images" in nodepool ver.0.3.1, but below sample file doesn't use > the key. > > https://github.com/openstack-infra/nodepool/blob/feature/zuu > lv3/tools/fake.yaml > > This has been renamed to 'labels' for the latest version. If you have more questions, feel free to visit us in #zuul on IRC. > Best regards, > > On 2017/09/29 23:58, Monty Taylor wrote: > >> Hey everybody! >> >> tl;dr - If you're having issues with your jobs, check the FAQ, this email >> and followups on this thread for mentions of them. If it's an issue with >> your job and you can spot it (bad config) just submit a patch with topic >> 'zuulv3'. If it's bigger/weirder/you don't know - we'd like to ask that you >> send a follow up email to this thread so that we can ensure we've got them >> all and so that others can see it too. >> >> ** Zuul v3 Migration Status ** >> >> If you haven't noticed the Zuul v3 migration - awesome, that means it's >> working perfectly for you. >> >> If you have - sorry for the disruption. It turns out we have a REALLY >> complicated array of job content you've all created. Hopefully the pain of >> the moment will be offset by the ability for you to all take direct >> ownership of your awesome content... so bear with us, your patience is >> appreciated. >> >> If you find yourself with some extra time on your hands while you wait on >> something, you may find it helpful to read: >> >> https://docs.openstack.org/infra/manual/zuulv3.html >> >> We're adding content to it as issues arise. Unfortunately, one of the >> issues is that the infra manual publication job stopped working. >> >> While the infra manual publication is being fixed, we're collecting FAQ >> content for it in an etherpad: >> >> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/zuulv3-migration-faq >> >> If you have a job issue, check it first to see if we've got an entry for >> it. Once manual publication is fixed, we'll update the etherpad to point to >> the FAQ section of the manual. >> >> ** Global Issues ** >> >> There are a number of outstanding issues that are being worked. As of >> right now, there are a few major/systemic ones that we're looking in to >> that are worth noting: >> >> * Zuul Stalls >> >> If you say to yourself "zuul doesn't seem to be doing anything, did I do >> something wrong?", we're having an issue that jeblair and Shrews are >> currently tracking down with intermittent connection issues in the backend >> plumbing. >> >> When it happens it's an across the board issue, so fixing it is our >> number one priority. >> >> * Incorrect node type >> >> We've got reports of things running on trusty that should be running on >> xenial. The job definitions look correct, so this is also under >> investigation. >> >> * Multinode jobs having POST FAILURE >> >> There is a bug in the log collection trying to collect from all nodes >> while the old jobs were designed to only collect from the 'primary'. >> Patches are up to fix this and should be fixed soon. >> >> * Branch Exclusions being ignored >> >> This has been reported and its cause is currently unknown. >> >> Thank you all again for your patience! This is a giant rollout with a >> bunch of changes in it, so we really do appreciate everyone's understanding >> as we work through it all. >> >> Monty >> >> ____________________________________________________________ >> ______________ >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscrib >> e >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> > -- > _/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/_/ > Rikimaru Honjo > E-mail:honjo.rikim...@po.ntt-tx.co.jp > > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- David Shrewsbury (Shrews)
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev