I haven't seen "malicious" meeting starters yet, let's hope that won't happen:) On the other hand, ad-hoc chair change can, and did, happen, so I agree with fungi - I don't think we need to put restrictions on that.
On 11 October 2017 at 09:11, Jeremy Stanley <fu...@yuggoth.org> wrote: > On 2017-10-11 21:35:26 +0530 (+0530), Swapnil Kulkarni wrote: > [...] >> The problem here is if we know who are most likely to chair the >> meeting e.g. [1] we can allow them to start the meeting. > [...] > > I'm pretty certain I wouldn't want to have to propose a patch to > update that every time I needed someone to chair a meeting in my > absence. This doesn't seem like a common enough issue to warrant the > added complexity and red tape of access controls on our meeting > automation. > -- > Jeremy Stanley > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev