Emilien Macchi wrote: > [...] > ## Proposal > > Proposal 1: create a new policy that fits for projects like installers. > I kicked-off something here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511968/ > (open for feedback). > Content can be read here: > http://docs-draft.openstack.org/68/511968/1/check/gate-project-team-guide-docs-ubuntu-xenial/1a5b40e//doc/build/html/stable-branches.html#support-phases > Tag created here: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/511969/ (same, > please review). > > The idea is really to not touch the current stable policy and create a > new one, more "relax" that suits well for projects like installers. > > Proposal 2: change the current policy and be more relax for projects > like installers. > I haven't worked on this proposal while it was something I was > considering doing first, because I realized it could bring confusion > in which projects actually follow the real stable policy and the ones > who have exceptions. > That's why I thought having a dedicated tag would help to separate them. > > Proposal 3: no change anywhere, projects like installer can't claim > stability etiquette (not my best option in my opinion). > > Anyway, feedback is welcome, I'm now listening. If you work on Kolla, > TripleO, OpenStack-Ansible, PuppetOpenStack (or any project who has > this need), please get involved in the review process.
My preference goes to proposal 1, however rather than call it "relaxed" I would make it specific to deployment/lifecycle or cycle-trailing projects. Ideally this policy could get adopted by any such project. The discussion started on the review and it's going well, so let's see where it goes :) -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
