Sending out a gentle reminder to vote for time slots that work for you [0]. We'll keep the poll open for a few more days, or until we reach quorum. Thanks!
[0] https://beta.doodle.com/poll/ntkpzgmcv3k6v5qu On 10/11/2017 01:48 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: > Oh - one note about the doodle [0]. All proposed times are in UTC, so > just keep that in mind when selecting your availability. > > Thanks! > > [0] https://beta.doodle.com/poll/ntkpzgmcv3k6v5qu > > On 10/11/2017 01:44 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: >> In today's policy meeting we went through and started prepping for >> the session. Relevant information has been captured in the etherpad [0]. >> >> We're going to hold the meeting using *Google* *Hangouts*. I'll >> update the etherpad with a link to the hangout once we settle on a >> date. If you plan on attending, please *vote* *for* *available* >> *times* [1]. I've proposed a bunch of time slots (4 each day for the >> next two weeks) to try and find a time that works for everyone. >> People from US, AU, and EU will be trying to attended, so we're not >> going to find a perfect time for everyone. Having said that, *we're >> going to record the session*. >> >> Most of what we talked about in the meeting today uncovered the need >> to go over the basics of AWS IAM. That should be something we can do >> with a free account, which I'm going to sign up for. If we need more >> time we can have another session or look at options for upgrading the >> account. >> >> >> [0] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/analyzing-other-policy-systems >> [1] https://doodle.com/poll/ntkpzgmcv3k6v5qu >> >> On 10/09/2017 04:23 PM, Lance Bragstad wrote: >>> I've put a scheduling session on the books for the next policy >>> meeting [0][1]. Advertising it here since folks who want to be >>> involved have responded to the thread. >>> >>> Let's use this meeting time to iron out account details and figure >>> out what exactly we want to get out of the session. >>> >>> >>> [0] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/#Keystone_Policy_Meeting >>> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/keystone-policy-meeting >>> >>> On 10/05/2017 02:24 AM, Colleen Murphy wrote: >>>> On Tue, Oct 3, 2017 at 10:08 PM, Lance Bragstad >>>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hey all, >>>> >>>> It was mentioned in today's keystone meeting [0] that it would >>>> be useful >>>> to go through AWS IAM (or even GKE) as a group. With all the recent >>>> policy discussions and work, it seems useful to get our eyes on >>>> another >>>> system. The idea would be to spend time using a video >>>> conference/screen >>>> share to go through and play with policy together. The end >>>> result should >>>> keep us focused on the implementations we're working on today, >>>> but also >>>> provide clarity for the long-term vision of OpenStack's RBAC >>>> system. >>>> >>>> Are you interested in attending? If so, please respond to the >>>> thread. >>>> Once we have some interest, we can gauge when to hold the >>>> meeting, which >>>> tools we can use, and setting up a test IAM account. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Lance >>>> >>>> [0] >>>> >>>> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2017/keystone.2017-10-03-18.00.log.html#l-119 >>>> >>>> <http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/keystone/2017/keystone.2017-10-03-18.00.log.html#l-119> >>>> >>>> Please count me in. >>>> >>>> Colleen >>>> >>>> >>>> __________________________________________________________________________ >>>> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >>>> Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe >>>> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >>> >> >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
