Emilien Macchi wrote: > > Thierry, when I read your comment on Gerrit I understand you prefer to > amend the existing policy and just make a note for installers (which > is I think the option #2 that I proposed). Can you please confirm > that? > So far I see option #1 has large consensus here, I'll wait for > Thierry's answer to continue to work on it.
Sorry I wasn't clear. I started working on tag modifications (to add ACL requirements and make it more clearly main-service-specific) when I realized it was just merely pointing to stable policy. Reading your proposed change it appeared as two variants on the same document... So I figured we could spare the creation of an additional tag. I'm fine with either approach really (solution 1 or solution 2). The important part is to define the variant/other policy in a way that would work for most deployment teams while benefiting the users interested in stability (i.e. a good trade-off between getting desirable fixes and being exposed to unnecessary risk). -- Thierry Carrez (ttx) __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
