On Fri, Nov 3, 2017 at 5:52 AM, Gabriele Cerami <gcer...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > since the failures in Tuesday's tests were caused by infra problems, we > believed a specific hash involved in the failures to remain the best > candidate for a promotion. > So we pinned it in our promotion pipeline and insisted on it for some > hours. It has passed all the tests twice, so we dacided to promote. > You will see the promotion date set to today, but the hash > > 3b718f3fecc866332ec0663fa77e758f8346ab93_4204ba89 > > is actually from Tuesday. > > Thanks. > > First off, thanks to TripleO team for helping to resolve so many issues [1]. I would especially like to thank Alex, Emilien and Gabriele for the VERY LONG hours spent closing out issues. Secondly I'd like to warn folks that some jobs started prior to the promotion and are using rpms from September. This is causing failures in tempest [2]. The jobs running with recently promoted yum repos [3], are passing. We are monitoring the queue for additional errors. Thanks [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-promotion-blockers-october-2017 [2] http://logs.openstack.org/21/517221/2/gate/legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode/a91ef0a/job-output.txt.gz http://logs.openstack.org/21/517221/2/gate/legacy-tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode/a91ef0a/logs/undercloud/var/log/extra/yum-list-installed.txt.gz [3] https://trunk.rdoproject.org/centos7-master/current-tripleo/ > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
