On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Pavlo Shchelokovskyy <pshchelokovs...@mirantis.com> wrote: > As a core in n-g-s myself I'm happy with either 1) or 2), but not really > fond of 3) as it kind of stretches the networking-baremetal scope too much > IMHO.
Personally, I'm happy with 1 or 2. I personally think we might as well lean towards 1 from a standpoint that we've had operators bring up using n-g-s, and while we as a community predicate that it is not intended for production use, and they are aware of that, they need something that works for their baremetal deployment scenario. Given the common usage, it just seems logical to me that we go for option 1. Especially since we already have a fairly good practice in Ironic of not approving things in sub-project that we do not understand. -Julia __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
