On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Sean McGinnis <sean.mcgin...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just put up a patch to fix the failing job: > > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/522284/ > > Are you saying it was redundant though?
I was just wondering if we actually need this post-release job. But I'll let the tripleo-ui maintainers to answer that question. > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 9:43 AM, Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> wrote: >> >> Yeah, I confirm we were able to build an RPM and release a new version >> of TripleO UI, which was our goal. I guess we can remove the >> flacky/failing job. >> >> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 3:54 AM, Honza Pokorny <ho...@redhat.com> wrote: >> > I'm investigating on behalf of the tripleo-ui team. It looks like the >> > definition for the jobs changed under us, and we'll need to update our >> > configuration. I'll track it down. >> > >> > For the time being, though, we can safely ignore this issue. As >> > indicated, the publish-openstack-javascript-tarball job succeeded. I >> > checked the tarballs listing, and the file is in fact present. Our >> > project doesn't produce any other release artifacts upstream. >> > >> > Please direct any future failures to me (in addition to the mailing list >> > of course) >> > >> > Thanks >> > >> > Honza Pokorny >> > >> > On 2017-11-21 21:34, Emilien Macchi wrote: >> >> Indeed, adding Jason in copy. >> >> >> >> Do we actually need release-openstack-javascript job? >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 21, 2017 at 8:27 PM, Tony Breeds <t...@bakeyournoodle.com> >> >> wrote: >> >> > On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 03:07:33AM +0000, z...@openstack.org wrote: >> >> >> Build failed. >> >> >> >> >> >> - publish-openstack-javascript-tarball >> >> >> http://logs.openstack.org/e5/e5831f230bd29516dc202eb406270604f27e27f9/release/publish-openstack-javascript-tarball/9908482/ >> >> >> : SUCCESS in 4m 58s >> >> >> - release-openstack-javascript >> >> >> http://logs.openstack.org/e5/e5831f230bd29516dc202eb406270604f27e27f9/release/release-openstack-javascript/95af4ef/ >> >> >> : POST_FAILURE in 6m 37s >> >> >> - announce-release announce-release : SKIPPED >> >> > >> >> > I'm not certain what went wrong here but [1] looks problematic >> >> > >> >> > Yours Tony. >> >> > >> >> > [1] >> >> > http://logs.openstack.org/e5/e5831f230bd29516dc202eb406270604f27e27f9/release/release-openstack-javascript/95af4ef/job-output.txt.gz#_2017-11-22_03_01_48_750499 >> >> > >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> >> > Release-job-failures mailing list >> >> > release-job-failu...@lists.openstack.org >> >> > >> >> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-job-failures >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Emilien Macchi >> >> >> >> >> >> __________________________________________________________________________ >> >> OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) >> >> Unsubscribe: >> >> openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe >> >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >> >> >> >> -- >> Emilien Macchi >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Release-job-failures mailing list >> release-job-failu...@lists.openstack.org >> http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-job-failures > > > > _______________________________________________ > Release-job-failures mailing list > release-job-failu...@lists.openstack.org > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/release-job-failures > -- Emilien Macchi __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev