Excerpts from gordon chung's message of 2018-01-10 23:28:05 +0000: > > On 2018-01-10 05:10 PM, Jon Schlueter wrote: > > I would think that a discussion around retiring a project should also > > include at least enumerating > > which projects are currently consuming it [5]. That way a little bit > > of pressure on those consumers > > can be exerted to evaluate their usage of an about to be retired > > project. It shouldn't stop the > > discussions around retiring a project just a data point for decision making. > > this is a very valid point. this is something overlooked on my part. > > out of curiosity, but what's the effect have 'retiring' something in > openstack and having services still referencing ceilometerclient? is it > that it will not get packaged in centos/ubuntu and therefore will be > missing requirements when installed? or can you not build the package at > all? > > cheers, >
The python-ceilometer client is empty now except for a README file explaining that the project is retired. So if there's a bug in the library, there's no convenient way for anyone to fix it. Doug __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev