Excerpts from Erno Kuvaja's message of 2018-01-15 12:59:44 +0000: > I think the worst case scenario is that we scrape together what ever > we can just to have something to say that we test it and not have > consistency nor clear responsibility of who, what and how. > (Unfortunately I think this is the current situation and I'm super > happy to hear that this is being discussed and the decision is not > made lightly.)
That seems very far from the current situation to me. We have a large integration test suite written primarily by contributors to the projects it tests. A subset of that is used for the trademark tests. That same subset is in 1 repo, managed by the QA team, who apply the extra review criteria needed for the trademark program to be stable. The fact that so many people seem uninformed about how all of this works is exactly why I think it's a mistake to spread the tests out and have a bunch of different teams applying different review criteria to them. Doug __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
