On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 10:52 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot <sathl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Emilien Macchi <emil...@redhat.com> writes: > > > Nice work Sofer! > > I have a few questions, see inline. > > > > On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 4:46 AM, Sofer Athlan-Guyot <sathl...@redhat.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> So join us (upgrade squad) to celebrate the working ocata->pike upgrade > >> job[1], without any depends-on whatsoever. > > > > w00t, really good work! > > > >> We would like it to be voting as soon as possible. It has been a > >> rather consuming task to revive that forgotten but important jobs, and > >> the only way for it to not drift into oblivion again is to have it > >> voting. > > > > The last time I asked how we could make RDO jobs voting, it was > > something in Software Factory to enable, but I'm not sure about the > > details. > > I'm ok to make them voting, as long as: > > > > - they don't timeout or reach the timeout limit (which isn't the case > > now, 2h27 is really good) > > - they proved to be stable during some time > > - they're part of the promotion pipeline so gate can't break easily > > > > BTW the process is documented here: > > https://github.com/openstack/tripleo-specs/blob/master/ > specs/policy/adding-ci-jobs.rst > > Oki reading that, thanks for the pointer. > > >> Eventually, let’s thanks rdo-cloud people for their support (especially > >> David Manchado), James Slagle for Traas[2] and Alfredo Moralejo for his > >> constant availability to answer our questions. > > > > ++ > > > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> [1] https://review.openstack.org/#/c/532791/, look for > «gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode-upgrades-pike» > >> [2] https://github.com/slagle/traas … the repo we use -> > https://github.com/sathlan/traas (so many pull requests to make that it > would be cool for it to be an openstack project … :)) > > > > Please rebase https://github.com/slagle/traas/pull/9 and address > > James's comments, so we can avoid using a fork. > > So yeah, the situation with traas is not so good as we have a 70 patches > difference with the main repo. The pull/9 may be abandoned (jfrancoa > will see if it’s still required) in favor of the what’s in > https://github.com/sathlan/traas . We’re going to work toward pulling > in slage/traas the main patches to avoid a fork. > Sofer, it's probably worth everyone's time to consider reviewing and testing the script provided in the logs with the successful upgrade itself to debug and recreate upgrade jobs. https://logs.rdoproject.org/91/532791/6/openstack-check/gate-tripleo-ci-centos-7-containers-multinode-upgrades-pike/Z0ac437d8cf634d4a8e1eca18b6dd0061/reproducer-quickstart.sh Thanks > > > Also, any plan to run tempest instead of pingtest? > > Not yet. We could cycle back to that at a later point in time, unless > it’s a requirement. Currently I’ve added it to our backlog. > > A last point is that we may add ceph in the mix based on what it’s done > in scenario 001 and 004. > > > > > Thanks, > > -- > > Emilien Macchi > > > > ____________________________________________________________ > ______________ > > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject: > unsubscribe > > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev > -- > Chem > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev >
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev