Excerpts from Sergey Lukjanov's message of 2013-12-13 07:46:34 -0800: > Hi Alessandro, > > it's a good idea to setup an IRC meeting for the unified agents. IMO it'll > seriously speedup discussion. The first one could be used to determine the > correct direction, then we can use them to discuss details and coordinate > efforts, it will be necessary regardless of the approach. >
I'd like for those who are going to do the actual work to stand up and be counted before an IRC meeting. This is starting to feel bike-sheddy and the answer to bike-shedding is not more meetings. I am keenly interested in this, but have limited cycles to spare for it at this time. So I do not count myself as one of those people. I believe that a few individuals who are involved with already working specialized agents will be doing the work to consolidate them and to fix the bug that they all share (Heat shares this too) which is that private networks cannot reach their respective agent endpoints. I think those individuals should review the original spec given the new information, revise it, and present it here in a new thread. If there are enough of them that they feel they should have a meeting, I suggest they organize one. But I do not think we need more discussion on a broad scale. Speaking of that, before I run out and report a bug that affects Savanna Heat and Trove, is there already a bug titled something like "Guests cannot reach [Heat/Savanna/Trove] endpoints from inside private networks." ? (BTW, paint it yellow!) _______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list OpenStack-dev@lists.openstack.org http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev