On Wed, Mar 28, 2018, at 7:59 AM, Takashi Yamamoto wrote: > hi, > > i'm thinking about publishing the latest release of tap-as-a-service on pypi. > background: https://review.openstack.org/#/c/555788/ > iirc, the naming (tap-as-a-service vs neutron-taas) was one of concerns > when we talked about this topic last time. (long time ago. my memory is dim.) > do you have any ideas or suggestions? > probably i'll just use "tap-as-a-service" unless anyone has strong opinions. > because: > - it's the name we use the most frequently > - we are not neutron (yet?)
http://git.openstack.org/cgit/openstack/tap-as-a-service/tree/setup.cfg#n2 shows that tap-as-a-service is the existing package name so probably a good one to go with as anyone that already has it installed from source should have pip do the right thing when talking to pypi. Clark __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
