Excerpts from Doug Hellmann's message of 2018-04-23 09:27:09 -0400: > [This is meant to be one of (I hope) several conversation-provoking > questions directed at prospective TC members to help the community > understand their positions before considering how to vote in the > ongoing election.] > > We frequently have discussions about whether the TC is active enough, > in terms of driving new policies, technology choices, and other > issues that affect the entire community. > > Please describe one case where we were either active or reactive > and how that was shown to be the right choice over time. > > Please describe another case where the choice to be active or > reactive ended up being the wrong choice. > > If you think the TC should tend to be more active in driving change > than it is today, please describe the changes (policy, culture, > etc.) you think would need to be made to do that effectively (not > which policies you want us to be more active on, but *how* to > organize the TC to be more active and have that work within the > community culture). > > If you think the TC should tend to be less active in driving change > overall, please describe what policies you think the TC should be > taking an active role in implementing. > > Doug
There was a question from ttx on IRC [1] about my use of the terms "active" and "reactive" here. I mean active as "going out there and doing things and anticipating issues" and reactive as "dealing with things as they come up and aren't resolved in another way". Doug [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/irclogs/%23openstack-tc/%23openstack-tc.2018-04-23.log.html __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
