On 2018-05-16 17:42:09 +0000 (+0000), Jeremy Stanley wrote: [...] > Unfortunately, I'm unable to find any follow-up summary on the > mailing list from the aforementioned session, but recollection from > those who were present (I had a schedule conflict at that time) was > that a Castellan-compatible key store would at least be a candidate > for inclusion in our base services list [...]
As Jim Rollenhagen pointed out in #openstack-tc, I was probably thinking of the earlier Pike PTG session the Architecture WG held, summarized at: http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-dev/2017-February/113016.html Ensuing discussion yielded that there was no good reason to rename a library even if the Oslo team was going to officially adopt it (which for castellan they subsequently did in March 2017). -- Jeremy Stanley
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
__________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
