Thank you as always for doing this, Chris. > Some of the older items in this list are not getting much attention. > That's a shame. The list is ordered (oldest first) the way it is on > purpose. > > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/546660/> > Purge comp_node and res_prvdr records during deletion of > cells/hosts
This is still on its first patch set, in merge conflict, with no action for about 3mo. Is it still being worked? > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/477478/> > placement: Make API history doc more consistent Reviewed. > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/556669/> > Handle agg generation conflict in report client Rebased. This previously had three +1s. > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/537614/> > Add unit test for non-placement resize Reviewed. > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/493865/> > cover migration cases with functional tests Reviewed. > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bug/1732731> > Bug fixes for sharing resource providers Two patches under this topic. https://review.openstack.org/533437 is abandoned https://review.openstack.org/#/c/519601/ reviewed (again) & rebased > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/535517/> > Move refresh time from report client to prov tree This patch is still alive only as a marker on my TODO list - I need to replace it with something completely different as noted by Jay & myself at the bottom. > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/561770/> > PCPU resource class Reviewed & rebased. This also made me notice an unused thing, which I've proposed to remove via https://review.openstack.org/575847 > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/566166/> > rework how we pass candidate request information This represents a toe in the waters of "we ought to go back and majorly refactor a lot of the placement code - especially nova/api/openstack/placement/objects/resource_provider.py - to make it more readable and maintainable. This particular patch is in merge conflict (pretty majorly, if I'm not mistaken) and probably needs to wait until the dust settles around nrp-in-alloc-candidates to be resurrected. > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/564876/> > add root parent NULL online migration Reviewed. (In merge conflict, and needs tests.) > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/q/topic:bp/bandwidth-resource-provider> > add resource_requests field to RequestSpec Active series currently starts at https://review.openstack.org/#/c/570018/ I've been reviewing these; need to catch up on the latest. > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/575127/> > replace deprecated accept.best_match Heading to the gate. > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/568965/> > Enforce placement minimum in nova.cmd.status Heading to the gate. > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/560107/> > normalize_name helper (in os-traits) Needs second core review, please. > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/573475/> > Fix nits in nested provider allocation candidates(2) Heading to the gate. > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/538498/> > Convert driver supported capabilities to compute node provider > traits Merge conflict and a bevy of -1s, needs TLC from the author. > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/568639/> > Use placement.inventory.inuse in report client Rebased. > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/517921/> > ironic: Report resources as reserved when needed Needs merge conflict resolved. > * <https://review.openstack.org/#/c/568713/> > Test for multiple limit/group_policy qparams Another marker for my TODO list. Added -W. > # End > > Yow. That was long. Thanks for reading. Review some code please. ++ -efried __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
