On 22/06/18 15:57, Flint WALRUS wrote:
Hi everyone,

Thanks for the updates and support, that appreciated.

@Gilles, did you already implemented all the service types?

We have query types for networks and subnets for now.
Before we add more we are going to focus on oslo policies so we can access and modify those items in respect of the existing security approach.
Then we will have a solid foundation to add more types.


What is left to do? You already want to merge the feature branch with master?

The feature branch graphql is the Proof of Concept and won't be merged to master until we have it full ready to share/demonstrate it to others. So we're pushing patches against that branch. The initial one to be hopefully merged soon.


@tristan I’d like to work on the feature branch but I’ll wait for gilles answers as I don’t want to mess up having pieces of code everywhere.

Thanks!
Le ven. 22 juin 2018 à 06:44, Gilles Dubreuil <gdubr...@redhat.com <mailto:gdubr...@redhat.com>> a écrit :


    On 22/06/18 09:21, Tristan Cacqueray wrote:
    Hi Flint,

    On June 21, 2018 5:32 pm, Flint WALRUS wrote:
    Hi everyone, sorry for the late answer but I’m currently trapped
    into a
    cluster issue with cinder-volume that doesn’t give me that much
    time.

    That being said, I’ll have some times to work on this feature
    during the
    summer (July/August) and so do some coding once I’ll have
    catched up with
    your work.

    That's great to hear! The next step is to understand how to deal
    with
    oslo policy and control objects access/modification.

    Did you created a specific tree or did you created a new graphql
    folder
    within the neutron/neutron/api/ path regarding the schemas etc?

    There is a feature/graphql branch were an initial patch[1] adds a
    new
    neutron/api/graphql directory as well as a new test_graphql.py
    functional tests.
    The api-paste is also updated to expose the '/graphql' http
    endpoint.

    Not sure if we want to keep on updating that change, or propose
    further
    code as new change on top of this skeleton?


    Makes sense to merge it, I think we have the base we needed to get
    going.
    I'll make it green so we can get merge it.


    Regards,
    -Tristan


    Le sam. 16 juin 2018 à 08:42, Tristan Cacqueray
    <tdeca...@redhat.com> <mailto:tdeca...@redhat.com> a
    écrit :

    On June 15, 2018 10:42 pm, Gilles Dubreuil wrote:
    > Hello,
    >
    > This initial patch [1]  allows to retrieve networks, subnets.
    >
    > This is very easy, thanks to the graphene-sqlalchemy helper.
    >
    > The edges, nodes layer might be confusing at first meanwhile
    they make
    > the Schema Relay-compliant in order to offer re-fetching,
    pagination
    > features out of the box.
    >
    > The next priority is to set the unit test in order to implement
    mutations.
    >
    > Could someone help provide a base in order to respect Neutron
    test
    > requirements?
    >
    >
    > [1] [abandoned]

    Actually, the correct review (proposed on the feature/graphql
    branch)
    is:

    [1] https://review.openstack.org/575898

    >
    > Thanks,
    > Gilles
    >
    >
    __________________________________________________________________________

    > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
    > Unsubscribe:
    openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
    <mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>

    >
    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
    >
    __________________________________________________________________________

    OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
    Unsubscribe:
    openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
    <mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>

    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

    __________________________________________________________________________

    OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
    Unsubscribe:
    openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
    <mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>

    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev



    __________________________________________________________________________
    OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
    Unsubscribe:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
    <mailto:openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

-- Gilles Dubreuil
    Senior Software Engineer - Red Hat - Openstack DFG Integration
    Email:gil...@redhat.com <mailto:gil...@redhat.com>
    GitHub/IRC: gildub
    Mobile: +61 400 894 219

    __________________________________________________________________________
    OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
    Unsubscribe:
    openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
    <http://openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe>
    http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev


--
Gilles Dubreuil
Senior Software Engineer - Red Hat - Openstack DFG Integration
Email: gil...@redhat.com
GitHub/IRC: gildub
Mobile: +61 400 894 219

__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to