---- On Thu, 28 Jun 2018 04:08:35 +0900 Sean McGinnis <[email protected]> 
wrote ---- 
 > > 
 > > There is no issue of backward incompatibility from Tempest and on Gate. 
 > > GATE
 > > is always good as it is going with mater version or minimum supported 
 > > version
 > > in plugins as you mentioned. We take care of all these things you mentioned
 > > which is our main goal also. 
 > > 
 > > But If we think from Cloud tester perspective where they use older version 
 > > of
 > > tempest for particular OpenStack release but there is no corresponding
 > > tag/version from plugins to use them for that OpenStack release. 
 > > 
 > > Idea is here to have a tag from Plugins also like Tempest does currently 
 > > for
 > > each OpenStack release so that user can pickup those tag and test their
 > > Complete Cloud. 
 > > 
 > 
 > Thanks for the further explanation Ghanshyam. So it's not so much that newer
 > versions of tempest may break the current repo plugins, it's more to the fact
 > that any random plugin that gets pulled in has no way of knowing if it can 
 > take
 > advantage of a potentially older version of tempest that had not yet 
 > introduced
 > something the plugin is relying on.
 > 
 > I think it makes sense for the tempest plugins to be following the
 > cycle-with-intermediary model. This would allow plugins to be released at any
 > point during a given cycle and would then have a way to match up a "release" 
 > of
 > the plugin.
 > 
 > Release repo deliverable placeholders are being proposed for all the tempest
 > plugin repos we could find. Thanks to Doug for pulling this all together:
 > 
 > https://review.openstack.org/#/c/578141/
 > 
 > Please comment there if you see any issues.

Thanks. That's correct understanding and goal of this thread which is from 
production cloud testing point of view not just *gate*. 
cycle-with-intermediary model fulfill the user's requirement which they asked 
in summit. 

Doug patch lgtm.

-gmann

 > 
 > Sean
 > 
 > __________________________________________________________________________
 > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
 > Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
 > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
 > 



__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: [email protected]?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to