Given that the ironic-lib version in question is already in upper-constraints, I think it may be fine. Realistically we do want people to be running the latest version of ironic-lib when deploying anyway. That being said, I'm +1 for this, however we need a second ironic-core to be willing to review this over the next few days.
On Mon, Jul 30, 2018 at 1:55 PM, Michael Turek <mjtu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > I would like to request a FFE for this RFE > https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/1749057 > > The implementation should be complete and is currently passing CI, but does > need more reviews. I'd also like to test this locally ideally. > > pros > --- > - Improves ppc64le support > > cons > --- > - Bumps ironic-lib version for both IPA and Ironic > > risk > --- > - There are other deployment methods for ppc64le, including wholedisk and > netboot. However, this feature is desired to improve parity between x86 and > ppc64le for tripleo. The feature should not affect any current working > deployment methods, but please review closely. > > Please let me know if you'd like more detail on this or have any questions! > Thanks! > > -Mike Turek > > > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
