Hi Forrest,

Yes, in my email, I was precisely referring to the work around
https://review.openstack.org/#/c/574477. Now that we are wrapping up Rocky,
I wanted to raise the visibility of this spec. I am glad you noticed. This
week we are going to cut our RC-1 and I don't anticipate that we will will
have a RC-2 for Rocky. So starting next week, let's go back to the spec and
refine it, so we can start implementing in Stein as soon as possible.
Depending on how much progress we make in the spec, we may need to schedule
a discussion during the PTG in Denver, September 10 - 14, in case face to
face time is needed to reach an agreement. I know that Manjeet is going to
attend the PTG and he has already talked to me about this spec in the
recent past. So maybe Manjeet could be the conduit to represent this spec
in Denver, in case we need to talk about it there

Best regards

Miguel

On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 4:12 AM, Zhao, Forrest <forrest.z...@intel.com>
wrote:

> Hi Miguel,
>
>
>
> In your mail “PTL candidacy for the Stein cycle”, it mentioned that “port
> mirroring for SR-IOV VF to VF mirroring” is within Stein goal.
>
>
>
> Could you tell where is the place to discuss the design for this feature?
> Mailing list, IRC channel, weekly meeting or others?
>
>
>
> I was involved in its spec review at https://review.openstack.org/#
> /c/574477/; but it has not been updated for a while.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Forrest
>
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev

Reply via email to