2018年8月14日(火) 13:38 Matthew Thode <prometheanf...@gentoo.org>: > > On 18-08-14 13:19:27, Akihiro Motoki wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I would like to request FFE for osc-lib 1.11.1 release. > > > > https://review.openstack.org/591556 > > > > osc-iib commit e3d772050f3f4de6369b3dd1ba1269e2903666f7 replaced > > issubclass() with isinstance() unexpectedly. > > As a result, osc-lib 1.11.0 breaks existing OSC plugins and > > the neutronclient OSC plugin gate is now broken. > > To fix the gate, osc-lib 1.11.1 release would be appreciated. > > > > upper-constraints is bumped to osc-lib 1.11.1. > > It is better to block osc-lib 1.11.0 but I am familiar whether we need > > to block it or not. > > > > What libs (further down the dep tree) would need the exclusion? They'd > likely also need a FFE for at least a UC bump. > You have my (and requirements) ack for a UC only bump at least.
AFAIK all OSC plugins and OSC directly consume osc-lib and there is no libs to consume osc-lib. In this case, we don't need to block a specific version of osc-lib, right? Perhaps it is just because I don't understand the current policy well. From neutronclient and other OSC plugin perspective, it is fine to bump UC only. Thanks, Akihiro Motoki (amotoki) > > -- > Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) > __________________________________________________________________________ > OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) > Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev __________________________________________________________________________ OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions) Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev