On 10/3/2018 11:21 AM, Zane Bitter wrote:
That patch is the only thing blocking the cleanup patch in
project-config, so I would like to get a definitive answer about what to
do. Should we close the branch, or does someone want to try to fix
things up?
I think we agreed on closing the branch, and Rico was looking into the
procedure for how to actually do that.
Doug
[1]https://review.openstack.org/#/c/597272/
I'm assuming heat-agents is a service, not a library, since it doesn't
show up in upper-constraints.
It's a guest agent, so neither :)
Based on that, does heat itself plan on putting its stable/ocata
branch into extended maintenance mode and if
Wearing my Red Hat hat, I would be happy to EOL it. But wearing my
upstream hat, I'm happy to keep maintaining it, and I was not proposing
that we EOL heat's stable/ocata as well.
so, does that mean EOLing the heat-agents stable/ocata branch could
cause problems for the heat stable/ocata branch? In other words, will
it be reasonable to run CI for stable/ocata heat changes against a
heat-agents ocata-eol tag?
I don't think that's a problem. The guest agents rarely change, and I
don't think there's ever been a patch backported by 4 releases.
OK, cool, sounds like killing the heat-agent ocata branch is the thing
to do then.
--
Thanks,
Matt
__________________________________________________________________________
OpenStack Development Mailing List (not for usage questions)
Unsubscribe: openstack-dev-requ...@lists.openstack.org?subject:unsubscribe
http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
