On 12/23/2013 12:10 PM, Collins, Sean wrote: > On Sun, Dec 22, 2013 at 12:30:50PM +0100, Salvatore Orlando wrote: >> I would suggest that external jobs should not vote until logs are publicly >> accessible, otherwise contributors would have no reason to understand where >> the negative vote came from. > > +1 > > I've had Tail-F NCS Jenkins -1 some things that the OpenStack > Jenkins has +1'd, and other times where I've seen it +1 things that > OpenStack Jenkins -1'd.
Agreed.
I also think we need to have these systems prove themselves on
reliability before they post votes back. A mis configured CI system can
easily -1 the entire patch stream, and many of us use -Verified-1 as a
filter criteria on reviews, which effectively makes that a DOS attack.
Detailed public results need to come first. After those look reliable,
voting can be allowed.
-Sean
--
Sean Dague
Samsung Research America
[email protected] / [email protected]
http://dague.net
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ OpenStack-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-dev
